supremevast.blogg.se

Idocument plus problems
Idocument plus problems












  1. #Idocument plus problems pdf#
  2. #Idocument plus problems software#
  3. #Idocument plus problems mac#

Naming conventions were then adopted but were often abandoned and so errors crept in.

#Idocument plus problems mac#

This is like the pre-Windows and Mac days of DOS when every file was limited to (usually cryptic!) 8 character filenames. For example, if you refer to 1,000 key documents you’ll need and end up with 1,000 “short names” for these documents.

idocument plus problems

In CaseMap, every document is an “object”, every person is an “object”, every organization is an “object”, etc., and every “object” must be given a “short name”. MasterFile doc-links work all the time, everywhere. So there are no direct file links to break! It’s that simple. Secondly, MasterFile stores all documents in the database itself. First of all, MasterFile doesn’t treat PDFs, “edocs”, pleadings, etc. So what’s the solution? The MasterFile doc-link. The simple fact is that direct file links are a weak method. You will no doubt run into these, and other subtle surprises and nuances (such as finding out other users can delete, move or rename directories with critical documents and break the file links even at the office) - but only after the fact and usually when you least need to be “surprised”. (Summation also has other linking problems unrelated to document files described later in this article.)

#Idocument plus problems pdf#

Similar problems exist with Summation’s handling of PDF (and other native format document files) with their “pleadings” feature, but not their “edoc” feature (which has its own problems), and so on. So you’ll bulk fix at home, bulk fix back at the office, co-counsel and other colleagues are all bulk fixing. They suggest you use their utility to bulk fix it. Concordance, for example, uses direct file linking for its PDF files, and specifically say they break if you move the PDF files (or looking at it another way - if you move). Unfortunately, that still won’t solve all your problems.

idocument plus problems

#Idocument plus problems software#

need the same software and a copy of the document database to review the documents. But now, all users - mobile users, clients, co-counsel, and remote offices, etc. You can avoid this by purchasing a document repository, such as Concordance or Summation, to use with CaseMap. If the actual files are renamed, moved, or become unavailable, such as when on the road, or when a client or co-counsel share the database on their own networks, the links break and you can no longer get the document. wherever they are on your network) to the document objects, facts, etc. Since CaseMap does not have any sort of document repository, it must use “linked files” and “related files” fields to connect the real document files (Word, PDF, TIFF, etc. The problem with CaseMap’s direct file linking: Broken links MasterFile’s solution to the above: Doc-links → The problem with point-to-point cross-linking of related information →

idocument plus problems

The problem with CaseMap’s “short names” → The problem with CaseMap’s direct file links: broken links → In this post, we unravel some of the problems with those approaches.

idocument plus problems

  • Concordance ®, on the other hand doesn’t provide any “linking” features similar to the above in CaseMap or Summation, other than tagging documents or notes with issues.
  • Summation ® talks of transcript links, evidence links, file attachment links, image links, internet links, linked documents, linking to “Core DB Summaries”, case organizer links, cross-links, link fields: Linked Document, Attachments, Related IDs, Attachment Doc IDs, Parent ID, Related Document IDs, Transcript Zoom Field, Case Organizer/DB Fields, issue fields, etc.
  • CaseMap ® talks of object links, issue links, source links, potential source links, question links, document links, linked files, related files, etc.
  • To do this, competitive products present a confusing and dizzying array of “linking” abilities: In reality, this simply means tagging information to issues or linking to a document - or a part of it - because a relationship exists (an affidavit and its attachments) or you’ve discovered a relationship (contradictory testimony) and you want to be able get to that related material quickly through some type of link. L itigation support products, including us(!), make much noise about “linking” because linking allows you to locate information quickly.














    Idocument plus problems